Quickliquidating com Adult webcam greek
Even if you work with a low-cost or discount broker, your transaction costs can add up over time if you consistently sell stocks quickly.
If you are selling your stocks quickly to take small profits, your commission cost becomes higher as a percentage of your gain.
Stocks are generally considered a long-term investment since they can be volatile over the short term.
However, this volatility is what encourages some stock investors to become short-term traders, in an attempt to capture a quick profit.
Case 03-26565-MS Doc 810 Filed 02/23/05 Entered 02/23/05 Desc Main Document Page 13 of 205 also, whether the 1998 benchmark for computing law sales and other damages was accurate. Your Honor, could I have just one -- THE COURT: Certainly. So, that we -- I do anticipate that we will have this approval. Case 03-26565-MS Doc 810 Filed 02/23/05 Entered 02/23/05 Desc Main Document Page 132 of 205 132 No one wants this settlement to go forth faster than we do, because we see this as the largest, at least initial pot of money, from which Fuji is going to get a thin dime. 133 But, for the moment, that’s some education as to what is necessary, based upon the issue that was raised by both Mr. UNIDENTIFIED MALE ATTORNEY: -- that was attached -- what you gave Your Honor, and then -- THE COURT: As I -- because, you’re in the dark and it’s unfair -- and it was not realized by the Court at the time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 J&J COURT TRANSCRIBERS, INC. SIROTA: My point, Judge, is, if there are issues out there on this outline or agreement, that in any way would undermine what I think everybody’s counting on, which is million paid, immediately upon the Court’s entry of the order approving it, and subject to disbursement, immediately, without any appeal, or any -- if there’s an appeal filed, we’re assuming that money can still be disbursed. STOERI: I’m not sure whether today, or tomorrow, but promptly, yes. 138 And, you know, from what I hear, parties will do what they can do to get the necessary documentation. Case 03-26565-MS Doc 810 Filed 02/23/05 Entered 02/23/05 Desc Main Document Page 140 of 205 MR. SIROTA: My request of the Court would be not to rule on the settlement until Mr. And, so this company well deserves to be put out of business and this Court welcomes that event as part of this settlement, or otherwise. JUROW: You know, this claim is (indiscernible), and I have a motion pending to convert that claim and I need a date on that. Case 03-26565-MS Doc 810 Filed 02/23/05 Entered 02/23/05 Desc Main Document Page 145 of 205 145 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: There are all kinds of benefits, if you will, in terms of efficiency to having the very quick liquidating plan rather than the conversion. ROSENTHAL: I just want to remind everybody that the subordination by Jason B. And, -- THE COURT: Well, with all due respect, distribution is not wound up by the settlement. And, Your Honor, importantly as well, and I don’t know that this is most importantly, we filed a cross motion with our objection and it’s our position and I understand that Your Honor granted the committee’s standing last week, sua sponte, but for the reasons that we set forth in our papers we believe that the committee can not gain standing. There’s vast differences between Cybergenics and a case like this. Case 03-26565-MS Doc 810 Filed 02/23/05 Entered 02/23/05 Desc Main Document Page 160 of 205 160 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 standing, and so we cross move for relief on that basis. THE COURT: Notwithstanding the fact that there were obvious conflicts on the board as a function of Mr. And so, there was no conflict, there was no breach of fiduciary obligations. So, it looked, I would think to a reasonable District Court Judge as Judge Linares is, as it does to at least this Bankruptcy Court Judge, without characterization, that there’s nothing to lose by going ahead with the litigation because the benefit to the individual, Mr. JUROW: Your Honor, may I just be heard briefly on the standing issue so that Mr. THE COURT: Well, I understand that that was your view and I had heard that before. So, we don’t take it lightly that a 25 million dollar settlement, visa ve how it trickles down to ultimately the shareholders which obviously it doesn’t, and how high you must go before there is actual dollars being paid to equity -- THE COURT: Wouldn’t that exceed 50 million dollars? But, this Court is influenced by what happened in the district court, and Judge Linares’ sua sponte suspension of the trial, following his active promotion of a settlement. One might ask, “Who knows better than Judge Linares? And that it was not a matter that was easily come by in the district court. The debtor, through its board, would not authorize the 25 million dollar settlement. Case 03-26565-MS Doc 810 Filed 02/23/05 Entered 02/23/05 Desc Main Document Page 203 of 205 203 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR.
Csiszar has served as a technical writer for various financial firms and has extensive experience writing for online publications. On damages, wide range, depending on different factors. Case 03-26565-MS Doc 810 Filed 02/23/05 Entered 02/23/05 Desc Main Document Page 120 of 205 120 witness? Case 03-26565-MS Doc 810 Filed 02/23/05 Entered 02/23/05 Desc Main Document Page 122 of 205 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: Sure. GREENHALGH: As -- since counsel raised that, I’d 122 like to ask Mr. Representatives of the local office -- and that official liquidator then has an -- a fiduciary obligation to the estates. ROSENTHAL: And then if I would go one step further -- THE COURT: Go ahead. ROSENTHAL: -- as I did in my document, I would suggest that Your Honor, if the settlement were approved, you should order all the parties before you, and it’s leaning, at this point, to take no step, direct or indirect, to interfere with that process of obtaining the consent of Jazz Hong Kong. To the extent we are able to satisfy Imation on their concerns, to the extent there are allowed unchallenged admin claims, or secured claims which don’t require a plan, per se, we would certainly -- and I speak for the debtor, I assume, as well, want to accomplish that, to preserve that million fund, and not run risk of it being overturned somewhere down the road, in the absence of a stay. THE COURT: Well, I -- again, I understand the tactics, I don’t know that this Court should base a decision on those tactics. And so, the real issue for this Court is whether this is a settlement that can be effectuated, not a settlement that can be effectuated so quickly as to blunt an appeal. I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 J&J COURT TRANSCRIBERS, INC. Novack’s statement that million, today, would be reasonable. To the extent ultimately there were a carve-out that was not available for all creditors there would be no exclusion from that for Photo Recycling Enterprises, Ltd. I don’t want the record to be interpreted as this Court’s determination -- MR. THE COURT: -- that the carve-out as initially stated then modified per your statement on the record today will not be effected. All parties are certainly reserving their right to argue for or against. And, Fuji has said that it’s still committed to the million dollar carve-out. Case 03-26565-MS Doc 810 Filed 02/23/05 Entered 02/23/05 Desc Main Document Page 153 of 205 153 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 allow the carve-out as had been proposed initially, the unsecured pure non-related creditors would do significantly better with this 25 million dollar settlement and the one million dollar carve-out than even the 30 million dollar number without that kind of provision that Mr. As you do know, the committee’s vote in support was two to one, and that has not changed. However, here, Your Honor, this settlement essentially wraps up everything in the estate and it liquidates or disposes of the primary asset of the estate. SCHWARTZ: And, going further than that, it’s the same defective notice that I talked about under Bankruptcy Rule 9019, stands true. Your Honor ruled on the standing of the committee to bring the issue and then directed the noticing. Sirota clearly put forth his position paper and an excellent one, I might add, but that was the business decision of the debtor. Benun, as the Court raised, had anything to lose from the board of directors, had anything to lose, I think is not entirely accurate. THE COURT: So it would exceed the last demand amount in the negotiation. GREENHALGH: Your Honor, my understanding of the negotiations, number one, is that a range was proposed and that litigation counsel, after making it known that they would recommend I believe 62 and a half million dollars, not 50, were then basically completely out of the settlement negotiations before Judge Linares. GREENHALGH: And if it was accepted then the debtor would have moved that settlement. And that settlement would not have generated a single dollar for your clients. The January 28th hearing on the conversion was adjourned for reasons of this Court’s scheduling, and in between Judge Linares by everyone’s -- everyone who weighed in and was involved -- by everyone’s view pressed for a settlement. Actually, I would include in the record of this hearing, all of the submissions that are cataloged in my opening statement. Fraza, as trial counsel there is a certain amount of motivation, self motivation and belief in a case that almost requires the optimistic view of that case. Fraza once explained that the process in their firm is to have those less involved in the litigation at least review offers -- a 50 to 75 million dollar proposal range was recommended. And, so but I would like there to be, it’s a lot of money, I would like there to be an order. So we didn’t consider that he’s a bad guy, he’s an infringer, or anything. And we looked at the -- well, I had heard the opening by Mr. There are questions about liability, which we considered -- although in candor, we thought the balance tipped in Jazz’s favor on the liability issue. THE COURT: Anyone else have questions for this J&J COURT TRANSCRIBERS, INC. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 J&J COURT TRANSCRIBERS, INC. GREENHALGH: Of him overseeing the debtor’s liquidation and cessation of business. Case 03-26565-MS Doc 810 Filed 02/23/05 Entered 02/23/05 Desc Main Document Page 131 of 205 liquidator. So, I may have an objective to accomplish that sooner, rather than later, even without a plan. STOERI: I believe so, and the answer is there should be no distribution of money, on our part, until we are clear that we have firm and final resolution of this matter. THE COURT: But, I think we can extrapolate from Mr. Greenberg, did we hear everything from you at the opening? GREENBERG: Your Honor, I believe you gave -- just a couple of comments so the record is clear. Silverberg last night that that would be reflected -- THE COURT: Absolutely. Novack as to settlement as proposed and where his firm as primary litigation counsel thought the reasonable level of settlement would be. And, I would just suggest that if the Court were ultimately to J&J COURT TRANSCRIBERS, INC. And, I have no further comments unless the Court has questions of me. If this were a run of the mill settlement under Rule 9019 then I agree that it wouldn’t be a sub rosa plan and we wouldn’t have those concerns. The debtor’s reasoned business decision in rejecting this settlement should not be subverted by the creditor’s committee opinion. Jurow stated in terms of the standing issue but Mr. GREENHALGH: But, that was a settlement offer in the spirit of negotiations, it was not an opinion that, “Well, 50 million dollars is a fair settlement.” I think, if I were -- THE COURT: Well, I mean, are you saying that if the plaintiff’s attorney in that case, that is Jazz’s attorney, offered 50 million dollars and -- MR. But, that that does not mean that my client would not receive an indirect benefit. And, I believe the trial started on the 10th of January, if I have that date correctly in my head. However one characterizes it, the district court in its wisdom during the penancy of a Jury trial that was to last seven weeks, and two weeks into that trial got heavily involved in negotiations to establish a settlement and the process is described in the record as well as in the submissions, and I’ll say what I would include in the record. You know, my first, my gut reaction is it’s to be held by the debtor-in- possession in an account that satisfied 345 and it wouldn’t surprise me if the debtor was going to ask to hold it in something other than a collaterized bank account like t-bills. You are certainly free to buy a stock back at any time; however, the IRS will not allow you to deduct your loss on the sale of a stock if you buy it back within 30 days of the sale.If you buy and sell stock in a traditional, commission-based account, you must pay a commission every time you make a stock transaction.
For example, if you sell your stock for a $100 commission after earning $10,000 in long-term profits, you are only paying 1 percent in commission.